Need to find a shop? Use the online Shop Locator


Home
IGO Insurance
Member Benefits
Unit Meetings
Shop Locator
About Us
Training
Collision News
Consumer
News
Links
Contact
Hall of Fame

Ready to join us?Download Membership kit here

Affiliated with

Hot Offers (1.25 - 3.31)

 

 

SCRS and AASP Press releases on Aftermarket Structural Replacement Parts

 

PRESS RELEASE

 
 
SCRS LogoFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
For Further Information:
Aaron Schulenburg, SCRS Executive Director
Phone: (302) 423-3537 or Email: aaron@scrs.com
 

SCRS Alerts Collision Repair Industry to Concerns Over Aftermarket Structural Replacement Parts

Prosser, WA, January 28, 2010-  In November 2009 and January 2010, SCRS National Director and Education Committee member, Toby Chess, performed presentations outlining comparative studies he had conducted between randomly selected OEM and Aftermarket Structural Replacement parts. The parts reviewed included items such as Front and Rear Bumper Reinforcement Beams, Radiator Core Supports, Bumper Brackets and Bumper Energy Absorbers. In every example tested, there were significant differences in both the construction of, and materials used, in the aftermarket replacement part which can significantly impact the roles that these parts serve in the transfer of energy resulting from a collision. Each of these parts also directly relates to the functionality and response of the vehicle Safety Restraint System (SRS), and could have a resulting affect on how the airbag functions in the event of a loss. The presentation also detailed that in other instances where the manufacturer had paid particular attention to utilizing the same materials as the OEM, and employed credible third-party testing, the parts appeared to perform much better in subsequent crash test video demonstrations.
 
As a result of these studies, the Auto Body Parts Association (ABPA), who represents more than 150 manufacturers, distributors and suppliers of aftermarket crash parts, has taken what SCRS views as a responsible first step, stating to their members that if sufficient testing is not available they recommend "discontinuation of the production and sale of these part types as well as immediate notification to the estimating systems to eliminate these parts from their database."
 
These studies were performed after receipt of concerns from various members' shops that there has been an increase in utilization of these aftermarket structural replacement parts in the claims settlement practices of certain insurance carriers. SCRS urges the collision repair industry to understand the magnitude of this issue, and to heed warning as well. SCRS recommends that collision repair professionals use exceptional caution when performing repairs to consumers vehicles, and to only use parts that will perform with the same expectation of quality and safety, both upon installation, and for the life of the vehicle. SCRS also recommends that repair facilities understand the liability associated with utilization of inferior parts, and to avoid being unduly influenced to utilize any replacement part that has not undergone credible independent testing to ensure it meets quality and safety based standards.
 
"This is a serious issue, that has not received enough attention from the industry in the past," reiterated Chess. "These parts are critically affecting the structural design of a vehicle in its post-repair state. I think the ABPA has shown their leadership through their release, and we need to hold their members, the people and organizations that manufacture and supply these parts, accountable for the quality and safety of their product. The OEMs put a lot of money into research and development to ensure that the end product operates reacts and sustains damage in very specific way. Any replacement part made available to the market should be required to have that same expectation of performance."
 
"This issue is concerning on so many levels," stated SCRS Executive Director Aaron Schulenburg. "Obviously our members have to understand the liability implications they have when making critical repair decisions such as part selection. The problem with many of these parts is that a visual inspection at the shop level often can't uncover significant differences, like material or alloy variances. We can't visually see the difference in weight, or that one part is .25mm thinner than another; especially when the two aren't side by side for comparison. It should also not be the responsibility of the shop to make a determination on which part is equivalent, or not. If it is not quality, if it is not safe, it shouldn't even make its way to the market; but they are. We have too many examples, even with current internal 'quality assurance programs' in place, that they are being manufactured, sold, and utilized, despite not meeting the most basic of requirements such as material composition."
 
"Most importantly, there has to be a way to address the individuals who already have parts that have now been deemed 'inferior' on their vehicle. It is not enough to accept that suppliers will deal with the issue on case by case bases if, or when, there is a problem. If the process and infrastructure are not in place, to support the ability to notify consumers when a problem has been identified, then we need to significantly fix that infrastructure before more parts are sold. If there is a parts problem generated from the OEM, there is an elaborate recall process in place. Every consumer is notified and their vehicle is corrected. These critical safety parts should not be treated with any less urgency. This is an issue that requires a proactive solution, rather than reactive; the motoring public deserves more," Schulenburg added.
 
SCRS has made the presentations prepared by Chess available on their website at www.scrs.com . We encourage every member of the industry to ensure you are familiarized with this issue. It is important for the repair industry to understand the subject matter, and it is also SCRS' hope that the insurance industry will exhibit equal concern over the seriousness of an issue that impact both industries, and the customer base we each serve. This will continue to be an area of significant focus for the association in the upcoming year, and will continue to share information on the subject as it develops.
 
 
About SCRS: Through its direct members and 37 affiliate associations, SCRS is comprised of 6,000 collision repair businesses and 58,500 specialized professionals who work with consumers and insurance companies to repair collision-damaged vehicles. Additional information about SCRS including other news releases is available at the SCRS Web site: www.scrs.com . You can e-mail SCRS at the following address: info@scrs.com 
 
###

 

SCRS Admin Office

Linda Atkins

Administrative Assistant

Email: info@scrs.com

Phone: (877) 841-0660

Mailing Address

P.O. Box 909

Prosser, WA 99350

 

 

Press Release

For Release: Immediate

February 1, 2010

Contact: Rick Starbard, President

(781) 289-0905

AASP Calls for Certification and Recall Process for

Aftermarket Structural Replacement Parts

Recent informal testing of aftermarket structural replacement parts by Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) member Toby Chess has spotlighted an important issue that has been largely ignored yet present in the collision repair industry for many years. These parts are installed on consumers’ vehicles each day, both in insurance-driven and customer-pay repairs, in spite of the fact that there presently exists no formal mechanism for certifying their quality and structural equivalence. A substandard non-structural aftermarket part might result in appearance, fit and corrosion resistance issues. Further, a substandard aftermarket structural part has the potential to affect the crashworthiness of the vehicle. The Alliance of Automotive Service Providers (AASP) contends that few, if any, fully-educated consumers would willingly jeopardize their vehicle’s (and occupants’) safety in trade for a cost savings of a few dollars.

The Certified Automotive Parts Association (CAPA) does not presently make available a certification process for aftermarket structural parts. The recent announcement by Diamond Standard of its intent to offer a comprehensive and independent certification process for structural parts is viewed as a timely and necessary offering. Our confidence in these parts, some of which may be well-engineered and structurally equivalent, will only be restored if and when a formal certification process is made available, and each of these parts is run through that process. In the absence of certification, the only responsible action is to fully remove their availability for use in collision repairs, including verified removal from each and every distributor’s shelves, in addition to the estimating databases.

The Auto Body Parts Association (ABPA) recently took the position that, "in the event that sufficient testing is not available, the ABPA has recommended discontinuation of the production and sale of these part types as well as immediate notification to the estimating systems to eliminate these parts from their parts databases." The Taiwan Auto Body Parts Association (TABPA) also advised its members to stop selling and manufacturing non-certified structural parts. These actions are to be commended, but highlight the fact that under the present system, we must now wait to see if the related industry segments – the parts manufacturers, parts distributors, repairers and the insurers specifying these parts – voluntarily act responsibly in the interest of consumer safety.

When structural testing and certification of this class of parts is available and parts testing begins, we will have empirical evidence as to which parts are structurally equivalent and which are not. At that time, the various segments within our industry will again be "tested" in terms of their commitment to remove known defective parts from consumers’ vehicles. As is presently the case with Toyota, full responsibility for a known safety-related defect requires that the problem be addressed not just going forward, but retroactively, as well. A formal recall process for defective collision parts will be both complicated and costly, especially in light of the fact that apparently many of these parts are not stamped by the manufacturer with proper identification, including production lot, as had been identified as critically necessary a decade ago.

The collision repair industry has been fully consumed by cost containment market forces over the past several years. While this may be a necessary evil, we must all ensure that these pressures do not come at the expense of the end-product goal – a proper repair that returns the vehicle to pre-accident condition, not just in terms of appearance, but much more importantly, in terms of safety.

The Alliance of Automotive Service Providers is a coalition of associations which serve over 8,000 members of the automotive service industry. In a spirit of mutual cooperation and support, Alliance participants are committed to sharing information, knowledge and other resources for the benefit of the members they serve. For more information about AASP, visit www.autoserviceproviders.com.

 

 

 

IGONC Supports the Database Enhancement Gateway (DEG) www.degweb.org

TigerDirect

 
This site best viewed with Internet Explorer 1024x768
Send mail to webmaster@igonc.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright 2001-2010 Independent Garage Owners of North Carolina Inc.
IGONC P.O. BOX 90426 RALEIGH NC 27675-8117 EBENEZER CHURCH ROAD, RALEIGH NC 27612
Last modified: 07/08/10