|















Ready to join us?Download
Membership kit here


Affiliated with



| |
SCRS and
AASP Press releases on Aftermarket Structural
Replacement Parts
| |
|
|
| |
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
For Further Information:
Aaron Schulenburg, SCRS Executive Director
Phone: (302) 423-3537 or Email:
aaron@scrs.com
SCRS Alerts Collision Repair Industry to
Concerns Over Aftermarket Structural
Replacement Parts
Prosser, WA, January 28, 2010-
In November 2009 and January 2010, SCRS
National Director and Education Committee
member, Toby Chess, performed presentations
outlining comparative studies he had
conducted between randomly selected OEM and
Aftermarket Structural Replacement parts.
The parts reviewed included items such as
Front and Rear Bumper Reinforcement Beams,
Radiator Core Supports, Bumper Brackets and
Bumper Energy Absorbers. In every example
tested, there were significant differences
in both the construction of, and materials
used, in the aftermarket replacement part
which can significantly impact the roles
that these parts serve in the transfer of
energy resulting from a collision. Each of
these parts also directly relates to the
functionality and response of the vehicle
Safety Restraint System (SRS), and could
have a resulting affect on how the airbag
functions in the event of a loss. The
presentation also detailed that in other
instances where the manufacturer had paid
particular attention to utilizing the same
materials as the OEM, and employed credible
third-party testing, the parts appeared to
perform much better in subsequent crash test
video demonstrations.
As a result of these studies, the Auto Body
Parts Association (ABPA), who represents
more than 150 manufacturers, distributors
and suppliers of aftermarket crash parts,
has taken what SCRS views as a responsible
first step, stating to their members that if
sufficient testing is not available they
recommend "discontinuation of the production
and sale of these part types as well as
immediate notification to the estimating
systems to eliminate these parts from their
database."
These studies were performed after receipt
of concerns from various members' shops that
there has been an increase in utilization of
these aftermarket structural replacement
parts in the claims settlement practices of
certain insurance carriers. SCRS urges the
collision repair industry to understand the
magnitude of this issue, and to heed warning
as well.
SCRS recommends that collision repair
professionals use exceptional caution when
performing repairs to consumers vehicles,
and to only use parts that will perform with
the same expectation of quality and safety,
both upon installation, and for the life of
the vehicle. SCRS also recommends that
repair facilities understand the liability
associated with utilization of inferior
parts, and to avoid being unduly influenced
to utilize any replacement part that has not
undergone credible independent testing to
ensure it meets quality and safety based
standards.
"This is a serious issue, that has not
received enough attention from the industry
in the past," reiterated Chess. "These parts
are critically affecting the structural
design of a vehicle in its post-repair
state. I think the ABPA has shown their
leadership through their release, and we
need to hold their members, the people and
organizations that manufacture and supply
these parts, accountable for the quality and
safety of their product. The OEMs put a lot
of money into research and development to
ensure that the end product operates reacts
and sustains damage in very specific way.
Any replacement part made available to the
market should be required to have that same
expectation of performance."
"This issue is concerning on so many
levels," stated SCRS Executive Director
Aaron Schulenburg. "Obviously our members
have to understand the liability
implications they have when making critical
repair decisions such as part selection. The
problem with many of these parts is that a
visual inspection at the shop level often
can't uncover significant differences, like
material or alloy variances. We can't
visually see the difference in weight, or
that one part is .25mm thinner than another;
especially when the two aren't side by side
for comparison. It should also not be the
responsibility of the shop to make a
determination on which part is equivalent,
or not. If it is not quality, if it is not
safe, it shouldn't even make its way to the
market; but they are. We have too many
examples, even with current internal
'quality assurance programs' in place, that
they are being manufactured, sold, and
utilized, despite not meeting the most basic
of requirements such as material
composition."
"Most importantly, there has to be a way to
address the individuals who already have
parts that have now been deemed 'inferior'
on their vehicle. It is not enough to accept
that suppliers will deal with the issue on
case by case bases if, or when, there is a
problem. If the process and infrastructure
are not in place, to support the ability to
notify consumers when a problem has been
identified, then we need to significantly
fix that infrastructure before more parts
are sold. If there is a parts problem
generated from the OEM, there is an
elaborate recall process in place. Every
consumer is notified and their vehicle is
corrected. These critical safety parts
should not be treated with any less urgency.
This is an issue that requires a proactive
solution, rather than reactive; the motoring
public deserves more," Schulenburg added.
SCRS has made the presentations prepared by
Chess available on their website at
www.scrs.com . We encourage every member
of the industry to ensure you are
familiarized with this issue. It is
important for the repair industry to
understand the subject matter, and it is
also SCRS' hope that the insurance industry
will exhibit equal concern over the
seriousness of an issue that impact both
industries, and the customer base we each
serve. This will continue to be an area of
significant focus for the association in the
upcoming year, and will continue to share
information on the subject as it develops.
About SCRS: Through its
direct members and 37 affiliate
associations, SCRS is comprised of 6,000
collision repair businesses and 58,500
specialized professionals who work with
consumers and insurance companies to repair
collision-damaged vehicles. Additional
information about SCRS including other news
releases is available at the SCRS Web site:
www.scrs.com . You can e-mail SCRS at
the following address:
info@scrs.com
### |
|
| |
|
SCRS Admin Office
Linda Atkins
Administrative Assistant
Email:
info@scrs.com
Phone: (877) 841-0660 |
|
|
|
|
Press Release

For Release: Immediate
February 1, 2010
Contact: Rick Starbard, President
(781) 289-0905
AASP Calls for Certification and Recall Process for
Aftermarket Structural Replacement Parts
Recent informal testing of aftermarket structural
replacement parts by Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS)
member Toby Chess has spotlighted an important issue that has been
largely ignored yet present in the collision repair industry for
many years. These parts are installed on consumers’ vehicles each
day, both in insurance-driven and customer-pay repairs, in spite of
the fact that there presently exists no formal mechanism for
certifying their quality and structural equivalence. A substandard
non-structural aftermarket part might result in appearance, fit and
corrosion resistance issues. Further, a substandard aftermarket
structural part has the potential to affect the crashworthiness of
the vehicle. The Alliance of Automotive Service Providers (AASP)
contends that few, if any, fully-educated consumers would willingly
jeopardize their vehicle’s (and occupants’) safety in trade for a
cost savings of a few dollars.
The Certified Automotive Parts Association (CAPA)
does not presently make available a certification process for
aftermarket structural parts. The recent announcement by Diamond
Standard of its intent to offer a comprehensive and independent
certification process for structural parts is viewed as a timely and
necessary offering. Our confidence in these parts, some of which may
be well-engineered and structurally equivalent, will only be
restored if and when a formal certification process is made
available, and each of these parts is run through that process. In
the absence of certification, the only responsible action is to
fully remove their availability for use in collision repairs,
including verified removal from each and every distributor’s
shelves, in addition to the estimating databases.
The Auto Body Parts Association (ABPA) recently took
the position that, "in the event that sufficient testing is not
available, the ABPA has recommended discontinuation of the
production and sale of these part types as well as immediate
notification to the estimating systems to eliminate these parts from
their parts databases." The Taiwan Auto Body Parts Association (TABPA)
also advised its members to stop selling and manufacturing
non-certified structural parts. These actions are to be commended,
but highlight the fact that under the present system, we must now
wait to see if the related industry segments – the
parts manufacturers, parts distributors, repairers and the insurers
specifying these parts – voluntarily act responsibly in the interest
of consumer safety.
When structural testing and certification of this
class of parts is available and parts testing begins, we will have
empirical evidence as to which parts are structurally equivalent and
which are not. At that time, the various segments within our
industry will again be "tested" in terms of their commitment to
remove
known defective parts from consumers’
vehicles. As is presently the case with Toyota, full responsibility
for a known safety-related defect requires that the problem be
addressed not just going forward, but
retroactively, as well. A formal recall
process for defective collision parts will be both complicated and
costly, especially in light of the fact that apparently many of
these parts are not stamped by the manufacturer with proper
identification, including production lot, as had been identified as
critically necessary a decade ago.
The collision repair industry has been fully
consumed by cost containment market forces over the past several
years. While this may be a necessary evil, we must all ensure that
these pressures do not come at the expense of the end-product goal –
a proper repair that returns the vehicle to pre-accident condition,
not just in terms of appearance, but much more importantly, in terms
of safety.
The Alliance of Automotive Service Providers is a
coalition of associations which serve over 8,000 members of the
automotive service industry. In a spirit of mutual cooperation and
support, Alliance participants are committed to sharing information,
knowledge and other resources for the benefit of the members they
serve. For more information about AASP, visit
www.autoserviceproviders.com.
|