Center for Auto Safety Opposes DOT Review on Auto Safety Standards

Believes effort will weaken vehicle safety rules

The Center for Auto Safety submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on its notice of regulatory review of several motor vehicle safety standards. The Center urged the DOT not to weaken or repeal regulations that protect drivers, passengers, and pedestrians, and create more benefits than costs.

According to the center, the DOT and NHTSA are reviewing regulatory policies on roof crush resistance, ejection mitigation, occupant crash protection, and electronic stability control systems for heavy vehicles.

“Where the benefits are greater than the costs, as they are for all of the safety standards subject to review, the Center for Auto Safety recommends they remain as written and we urge stricter enforcement to allow for the maximum benefit from these regulations,” said Center for Auto Safety Executive Director Jason Levine.

Based on NHTSA’s own analysis, the benefits to society of the following safety rules outweigh the costs. The rule on ejection mitigation, which prevents passengers from being fully or partially thrown from vehicles, creates $3.55 billion in net benefits annually. The regulation for roof-crush resistance—which prevents intrusion of the roof structure into the passenger compartment of a vehicle—continues to reduce rollover deaths and injuries.  According to NHTSA’s figures, the rule produces $285 to $850 million in annual net benefits. The benefits of occupant crash protection regulation, which can prevent up to 858 injuries annually, exceed the costs by $20-$475 million. Regulation for electronic stability control systems for heavy vehicles—which help prevent rollovers and oversteer and understeer conditions in trucks and buses—also create more benefits than costs. This rule saves lives and generates $267-$480 million in annual net benefits.

“The Center for Auto Safety opposes any modification to these standards that would inhibit the implementation and future actualization of this potential,” said Levine. “If anything, these rules could have been strengthened during the rulemaking stage to provide additional benefits to consumer safety at a minimal cost to automakers. Now that they are in place, the key to providing the maximum consumer benefit in exchange for the related societal costs is for NHTSA to zealously enforce these regulations, not repeal or weaken them.”

Written by triciasauls

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *